Sam wil be on the bench for one week for a particular nasty post centered on a poster.
I have been Reading these posts now for quite a while. However I did not read the one concerning the above.
Banning Sam for a week is rather harsh. (what ever happened to verbal warnings!!!!) There have been threads posted about him in a personal manner and he has every right to defend his position.
One in particular as quoted saying
'Headteacher's son demands resignation of Govenors'
Do you think that this was not reason enough for you to act as judge and jury as to whether this new thread should have been posted.
As far as I can see Sam did not DEMAND the resignation of the govenors, he merely agreed with the intention set.
I am sure Sam would have apologised and would understand that curbing his personal attacks is essential.
Daffy Some of this activity is welcome, but much of it is just garbage or abuse that will deter legitimate users from contributing if it is allowed to continue
Have all the the rest been banned as well.
Daffy Vigorous debate is tolerated and even encouraged, but please do not allow yourself to be sucked into gratuitous slanging matches.
No doubt this will continue as St James Pupils stand united and defend their school and personal remarks made against them and their family members.