the St James Pupil posting on this thread is evidently very angry and exceptionally naive to be making such vague assumptions and believing that he is representing the current St James in a good light.
He is evidently not an adult (as has been speculated) because his irrational rantings are undoubtedly childlike. I would guess he is at GCSE level of education.
Im angry and exceptionaly naive?...right.... evidence for that? I mean you can judge what a person is like just from a few postings on a webpage? my you are good....ever considered going into politics?
I make vague assumptions....care to expand on that?
i made one or two assumptions and i stated clearly they were assumptions...they were however not vague by any means.
my 'irrational rantings are undoubtedly childlike' and you would guess I am at GCSE level of education? personally i think you're the irrational one and rantings? Again i find myself asking you for evidence...
I must say i expected some decent insights from people, not posts at the level of this one.... one repeatedly makes no decent input but instead claims that all St James pupils have no empathy soley based on the fact i said that people should try and move on IN MY OPINION. And lastly we have the poster who accused me of being MR BODDY in DISGUISE!!
It seems no one bothers to read my posts carefully, people keep on making points which i had clearly explained in my post, sometimes they COMPLETELY miss the POINT, for example
st james pupil wrote:
...not to cause pain to others, bullying is dealt with most severely in the school
Oh, the irony
You really do seem to be letting St James distance itself from the past? How would it be ironical if the St James now is in no way linked from the St James of 20 years ago?
alban wrote in reply:
The irony is that "bullying is dealt with most severly" is in complete contrast with the bullying of the children by the teachers.
In fact the poster i was answering to had written about how St James hadnt distanced itself from the past and then followed on to comment about how ironical it was that bullying was dealt most severely in the current St James.
i was merely raising the point how could St James distance itself from the past if people didnt let it?
If he WAS allowing St James to distance itself from the past then he wouldnt have made the point about how ironical it was that the current St James deals with bullying severely and the previous bullying of St James pupils by teachers.
Anyway i think its quite sad that the majority of the people here are so firmly against St James. Anything pro-St James posted here is attempted to be torn apart. I dont think there is any point in answering anymore of the replies here, and i think IT IS WELL AND TRULY SAD people are willing to be swayed by some of the anti St James opinions on this website. I.E. the parent who has decided to withdraw his/her child from St James.