Hi Tom,
Thanks for the clarification, and certainly in draft form my post did include a retraction of 'fake' on the basis that if he genuinely belived what he was posting he was not ergo being a fake.
Maybe there was another reason that that word came up. The general seperation between intellect and emotion that I experienced as being encouraged in St J, St V and SES, led to a lot of behaviour that I would now call fake, in that the person is not telling their whole truth, just their intellectual truth. As a whole person (emotionally and intellectually free) they would truly be being themselves.
I recognise that in this instance 'fake' is innapropriate as it is the wrong word entirely. Unfortunately at this time I cannot think what the right word is.
NEW MESSAGE FROM DAVID BODDY
_____________________________________________________________
Last edited by Shout on Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Return to “St James and St Vedast”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests