Sam Hyde wrote:Maybe not cricket but we're noobies, and are surprised that this was found 'offensive' anyway.........moving on.
Sam xox
No apology for a mistake then?
there you go,read the previous posts!Daska if you come back to read this, like i said before i in no way wished to insult or provoke you, and I was being sincere, I am sorry if I did. I mearly presented the information I had to the argument, and if you feel it was presented in an agressive way it was not meant to be like that.
WILDONE wrote:The new Boys of St James's are doing what they know is right. Well done boys in defending your school.
james wrote:BTW all my info is of the senior boys, i don't know about the senior girls or junior school.
Zathura wrote:I ask the governors if they tell parents on introduction to St James that a key element to the S.E.S teachings, a core part, is that a woman should obey a man. If not then this unpopular S.E.S belief is hidden from parents. This is a hidden agenda. All the S.E.S couples I know have a relationship in which the woman obeys the man in no uncertain terms. Great pains are taken to arrange for the old wedding vows from Victorian times at these marraiges. This is almost one hundred percent commonplace within the S.E.S. All couples. This IS a fact unlike a lot of Justice's junk.
So there is a lot of S.E.S stuff that is hidden and is spun to the public. Most of it passes through a filter before it reaches the public. It is only inside that the hidden authority figures hold their sway
Return to “St James and St Vedast”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests